not that regular camping paths are anything less than awesome On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Albert Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice Pedro, but unfortunately I've gone back to using the > regular Camping paths. It's less RESTfull, but more robust. > > if I was to call app/1/k, markaby (?) would show me the cookie name, same > with (i) for italic 1, (b) for bold 1, and a few others. > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:38 AM, pedro mg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > i gave a quick look at the code and it seems you need to work out the > > route for "ping" on the Devices class. I'm not using reststop, but > > went to check it out. > > > > > > http://reststop.rubyforge.org/classes/Camping/Controllers.src/M000011.html > > > > def no_method(e) > > _error("No controller method responds to this route!", 501, e) > > end > > > > def not_found(e) > > _error("Record not found!", 404, e) > > end > > > > Seems those 501 are being delivered by reststop. > > ... > > Or... you can try to change Reststop yourself ;) on your own risk, > > following or not the REST architecture :) > > > > > pedro mg > > http://blog.tquadrado.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Camping-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > > > >
_______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
