On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:06:09AM +0100, Isak Andersson wrote: > I think Alternative 2 makes the most sense. Then you can have multiple apps > that don't share the public folder. Plus, you put almost everything in the > app folder anyways so there shouldn't be a difference now either. > > >Alternative 2: > > > > app.rb > > app/public > > app/public/style.css # example
I disagree. In most cases there is only one app (at least for most of my apps). So I have an app.rb with stuff under public/. If there are more apps, there is no way of knowing whether they are designed to work together and share the same public data, or they are apps with seperate(d) public data. Since one has to build the URLs in the app anyway, why not let the developer decide the layout of public/ to suit a shared or seperated layout? (One can think of shared stylesheets, but different sets of icons/PDFs/whathaveyou). Kind regards, Paul -- Web: http://paul.luon.net/home/ | Email: p...@luon.net Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
