Sue Burchett wrote: > >> But the question for us, as users, is whether BW is a better organisation >> with those 180 _posts_ removed. Does BW function better without (say) >> two central freight staff, a distinct Birmingham-based unit, a dedicated >> regeneration director - whoever they may be? Is BW improved by no longer >> having a heritage person in the waterway unit Chris D mentioned? >> cheers >> Richard > > Can the system manage with losing more on the ground staff? It isn't just > office staff that are going and not being replaced. > Sue nb Nackered Navvy >
My understanding...as a result of a direct question to BW, is that there are no ground staff amongst the 180 redundancies. They are all admin. Cheers -- Will Chapman Save Our Waterways www.SaveOurWaterways.org.uk
