Roger Millin wrote in usual stirring mode: > David wrote about Mike's answer (second para) > >> Sounds a bit like BWspeak just before they announce that, after > consultation with all parties... > >> All that has been agreed is the following - "Continuing to look > into the >> advantages and the consequences of permanent use of dipped > headlights or >> special lights by vehicles for day-time driving". > > Hhmmm, I think you're on a hiding to nothing David. You're arguing > with someone who has a vested interest, although in fairness that has > proved *very* useful to the UK waterways' cause in the past and > continues to do so. Doesn't mean that you can't have a really good > pop at him though! ;-))))
Thanks for nothing BSM :-( -- Regards Michael Clarke Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.petroleumblownaparte.eu/
