Allan wrote" Incidently, people like Graham? who think that everbody should 
have 
moorings, "

Sorry Allan, that is not what I believe! I have no issue with true continuous 
cruisers who travel the system continuously. I object to people who claim they 
se continuous cruisers but then just move back and forth within a very 
restricted area as they wish to remain in one place for whatever reason. They 
are the people I believe should pay for a mooring. 

I also believe your second point about the attitude of certain BW staff may be 
influenced by their views on whether the boaters they are dealing with are 
genuine continuous cruisers or not.

www.jannock.org.uk
--------------------------
Graham


Let your email find you with BlackBerry from Vodafone

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun Apr 22 06:45:02 2007
Subject: [canals-list] Re: Allan's Rant

--- In [email protected], "Brian Holt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> "Brian Dominic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> : [Default] On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:25:57 +0100, "Susan Burchett"
> 
> :
> : >Have we any 'right' to know who has paid and by what method?
> : >
> : My view is that as fully-paid-up users, you should have the right 
to
> : know that other people are also fully paid up because it's unfair 
to
> : YOU that anybody should get away with not paying. The method is
> : immaterial - you merely need to know that they're paying!
> :
> : Brian L Dominic
> :
> :
> Just out of interest how many people walk around parked cars and 
report 
> all those without Tax discs/MOT/insurance that are likely to be 
> unroadworthy and kill some one
> 
> -- 
> Brian Ancient Order of Sewer Ants

I don't know the answer, Brian but car tax does not cost between 
£600 - £800 on average! Not only that but most people, when on the 
canals meander through them and have much more time to ponder about 
the unfairness of the non-payers and the people who do not contribute 
to the upkeep of the  waterways.

Incidently, people like Graham? who think that everbody should have 
moorings, (And pay for them) should bear in mind that the hard earned 
cash, (Or in my case pension) does not contribute to the well being, 
upkeep and keeping the aterways in good condition.

Going back to the basis of "ALLANS RANT" it ws the beauocracy about 
the legal rules and regulations that I object to, when canal and 
river staff SHOULD BE more intersted in a positive attitude to canal 
users and the intellegent application and discretion of the "rules"

~Allan~



 
Yahoo! Groups Links




Reply via email to