[Default] On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:18:56 +0100, Adrian Stott
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  finished tucking into their plate of fish, chips
and mushy peas. Wiping their mouth, they swiggged the last of their
cup of tea, paid the bill and wrote::
>
>Have they considered taking cranes in by barge to secure the unsafe
>stuff?
>
>Or even by rail, come to that?
>
The bean counters decided  years ago that maintaining a fleet of
breakdown cranes "just in case" was money down the drain - similarly
with snowploughs!
>
>I think this issue also applies to closures for
>maintenance/(re)construction of rail crossings, where, in the absence
>of compensation requirements, Network Rail is awfully keen to shut
>everything for months just in case. 

.............. and to suit themselves. In 1990, we had a bad, wet,
snowfall that fetched down an awful lot of overhead lines in
Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire, including two long spans - one over
the A52 just east of Nottingham and one over the BR line (and Erewash
Canal) at Stanton Gate. Putting the first back was relatively easy -
the police closed the road for half-an-hour in the middle of the night
with no notice to road users (such as they were) so the wires could go
up - BR wanted us to have a possession of the railway for a day (on a
freight-only line with, at the time, minimal traffic that could be
re-routed) "and that'll take six months to organise, sir". They soon
backed down when we explained that our customers with no electricity
wouldn't be very happy with THAT! 

BTW, BW were no problem!
Brian L Dominic

Web Sites:

Canals: http://www.brianscanalpages.co.uk

Friends of the Cromford Canal: http://www.cromfordcanal.org.uk 

(Waterways World Site of the Month, November 2005)

Reply via email to