On 26/09/2008, Adrian Stott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A canoe *would* still pay less then a cruiser, as the charge would be > payable only for the days it was in the water. Most canoes are kept > out of the water in sheds for most of the year, not at moorings. > > Adrian
But when you remove a boat from the water, more water is required to fill up the gap where the boat once was. So shouldn't there be a charge every time the canoe is removed? (or at least in the "take everything five steps beyond its logical conclusion" world in whioch much of this debate is taking place.) -- Nigel Stanley
