The 3rd run passed -- so maybe this test is more flaky than outright broken.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058422 Title: KernelSecurityTest.test_360_stacksignal_memleak fails Status in QA Regression Testing: New Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests: New Bug description: For s2024.02.04 Bionic:linux-gcp-5.4 on instance n2d-standard-64 (suite ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security) test case KernelSecurityTest.test_360_stacksignal_memleak fails with "Kernel memory does not leak to userspace in signalstack (CVE-2009-2847)" test_360_stacksignal_memleak (__main__.KernelSecurityTest) Kernel memory does not leak to userspace in signalstack (CVE-2009-2847) ... FAIL ====================================================================== FAIL: test_360_stacksignal_memleak (__main__.KernelSecurityTest) Kernel memory does not leak to userspace in signalstack (CVE-2009-2847) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "./test-kernel-security.py", line 2148, in test_360_stacksignal_memleak self.assertShellExitEquals(expected, self._unpriv_cmd(["./signal-stack"])) File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/testlib.py", line 1321, in assertShellExitEquals self.assertEqual(expected, rc, msg + result + report) AssertionError: Got exit code -11, expected 0 Command: 'sudo', '-u', 'ubuntu', './signal-stack' Output: [+] Checking platform... [+] sizeof(stack_t) = 24 [+] Correct size, 64-bit platform. [+] Checking for stack_t hole... [+] ss_flags end (12) != ss_size start (16) [+] Hole in stack_t present! [+] Ready to call sigaltstack. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 1 test in 0.096s FAILED (failures=1) 16:25:18 INFO | END ERROR ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security.KernelSecurityTest.test_360_stacksignal_memleak This particular test case has not failed on any previous cycles for Bionic:linux-gcp-5.4, but the failure is the same between run #1 and #2 of the test. A 3rd run is in progress, and if the results are any different I will link them here. I have attached the full console output to this bug as well. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/2058422/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
