I think it's probably fine to just post your not-for-rails questions to this list. If they don't get answered here, it's a good bet they wouldn't get answered on a lower-traffic list. For now I don't think the not-for-rails questions come up often enough to warrant a separate list.
- Jamis On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Tim Diggins wrote: > > Hi all - > > following rachels & others posts recently, I was wondering if it's > worth having a separate capistrano-not-for-rails list -- most likely > much less traffic, but more highly specific discussions. > > Would any of the developers (esp. Jamis !?) and/or uber-users like > the idea & be willing to lurk & occasionally contribute if this list > was set up? > > TIm > > (more justification, in case needed: I find that when I'm using cap > for rails, most of my questions are already answered online (somewhere > or other), but when I'm using it for, e.g. java deployment, then it's > hard to find the answers (though they are sometimes out there) - the > two different usages have very different kinds of questions/ > discussions). > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
