Thanks, I only wanted it if it was already there. It's really not important. :-)
- Mike On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Jamis Buck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Mike, > > Not currently, no. Namespaces have zero functionality other than to > scope the names. > > - Jamis > > On 1/27/09 4:03 AM, Mike Bailey wrote: > > Thanks Lee, > > > > I was actually wondering about whether I can set :role => :web for a > > namespace. > > > > namespace :deprec do > > namespace :apache, :roles => :web do > > > > - Mike > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Lee Hambley <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Yep thats easy, here's a pastie: > > > > * http://pastie.org/371967 > > > > Don't pull me on my shoddy coding ;) but that's how the default > > methods work. > > > > You can put a default at any level of a nested namespace. > > > > = Lee > > > > > > 2009/1/27 Mike Bailey <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > >> > > > > It just occurred to me that it would be handy to specify a > > default role for a namespace. Is this already possible? > > > > thanks, > > > > Mike > > > > namespace :deprec do > > namespace :apache, :roles => :web do > > > > <snip> > > > > end > > end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
