Hi, Rafa. The pull request for multiple gateways support was already merged to master tree. Try latest 2.x version. also can see the code in
https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/blob/master/lib/capistrano/configuration/connections.rb It seems original GatewayConnectionFactory instance only create tunneled connection. following part in connections.rb sets default gateway server implicitly. == class GatewayConnectionFactory def initialize(gateway, options) # snip .. @gateways = {} if gateway.is_a?(Hash) # snip .. gateway.each do |gw, hosts| gateway_connection = add_gateway(gw) [*hosts].each do |host| @gateways[:default] ||= gateway_connection @gateways[host] = gateway_connection end end == Dose anyone have good solution? On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Rafa García <conta...@rafagarcia.net> wrote: > I've never done it but there's a pull request relatid with your problem: > > https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/pull/18 > > So I think it should works :) > > > 2011/12/6 Donovan Bray <donno...@gmail.com> >> >> You know now that I look at my code and scripts i think it just appears to >> work for me, because even though I specify different gateways both sets of >> servers are reachable by either gateway. I had assumed that the gateway was >> part of the server definition. So ignore what I said. >> >> >> On Dec 6, 2011, at 3:25 AM, Nobuhiro Nikushi <deneb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > The recipe you suggested did not work. Client still login to the >> > server a and b via gate1. >> > >> > $ cap prod deploy:check # multistage gem extention is >> > installed >> > * 20:04:11 == Currently executing `prod' >> > triggering start callbacks for `deploy:check' >> > * 20:04:11 == Currently executing `multistage:ensure' >> > * 20:04:11 == Currently executing `deploy:check' >> > servers: ["a", "b", "c", "d"] >> > * establishing connection to gateway `"gate1"' >> > * Creating gateway using gate1 >> > * establishing connection to `a' via gateway # <-- still connect >> > to gateway..... >> > * establishing connection to `b' via gateway # <-- still connect >> > to gateway.... >> > * establishing connection to `c' via gateway >> > * establishing connection to `d' via gateway >> > >> > --Nobuhiro Nikushi >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Donovan Bray <donno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> server "a", :app >> >> server "b", :app >> >> >> >> set :gateway, 'gate1' >> >> >> >> server "c", :app >> >> server "d", :app >> >> >> >> Will do what you want, the first two wont have a gateway, but the >> >> latter two will and they'll all be in the app role >> >> >> >> On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Nobuhiro Nikushi <deneb...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi all. I'm trying my Capfile to choise whether or not to use gateway >> >>> server depend on servers or roles. >> >>> >> >>> my enviroment: >> >>> client ----------------> server_a >> >>> ----------------> server_b >> >>> --> gate1 --> server_c >> >>> --> gate1 --> server_d >> >>> >> >>> I tried the multiple-gateways function supported after 2.6.0. >> >>> https://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/pull/18 >> >>> >> >>> I tried following codes, it work well for server_c and d. but not work >> >>> for server_a and b. cap try to connect via gate1 :( >> >>> >> >>> set :gateway, { >> >>> 'gate1' => [ 'server_c', 'server_d' ], >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> I want client to connect to server_a and b directly. >> >>> >> >>> Does anyone have good idea? >> >>> >> >>> --Nobuhiro Nikushi >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>> Groups "Capistrano" group. >> >>> * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com >> >>> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this >> >>> group >> >>> at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en >> >> >> >> -- >> >> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> Groups "Capistrano" group. >> >> * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com >> >> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group >> >> at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en >> > >> > -- >> > * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Capistrano" group. >> > * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com >> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group >> > at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en >> >> -- >> * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Capistrano" group. >> * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com >> * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group >> at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en > > > -- > * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Capistrano" group. > * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com > * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group > at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en -- * You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Capistrano" group. * To post to this group, send email to capistrano@googlegroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send email to capistrano+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/capistrano?hl=en
