> On Dec 26, 2022, at 3:28 PM, Kenton Varda <ken...@cloudflare.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure what you mean about "(negative) remote capability #". There are > no negative numbers.
Oops, I got that from the old E documentation (erights.org.) They used negative numbers to identify capability IDs that were created on the “other side” of the connection, i.e. promises. (Speaking of which, is there any other good reading material on capabilities-with-RPC, besides erights.org and your own rpc.capnp?) —Jens -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cap'n Proto" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to capnproto+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/capnproto/78B9153A-CCA2-4BEE-A628-E46CE039E286%40mooseyard.com.
