Hi,
I was reviewing this draft and found a few missing text(sometimes obvious)
enumerated below(missing text in bold underline)
Section 2.1 IPv4 DHCP Option
o Code: The Captive-Portal DHCPv4 option (TBD) (one octet).
o Len: The length, in octets of the URI.(one octet)
Section 2.2: IPv6 DHCP Option
o option-code: The Captive-Portal DHCPv6 option (103) (two octets).
o option-len: The length, in octets of the URI.(two octets) --? Please see
question below
o URI: The contact URI for the captive portal that the user should
connect to (encoded following the rules in
[RFC3986<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986>]).
- Question on the above option-len: If this is two octets in IPv6 DHCP
option, then the URI can be longer then 255. Option-len-value <=255, correct?
Section 2.3: The Captive-Portal IPv6 RA Option
o Type: 37(one octet)
o Length: 8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option
(including the Type and Length fields) in units of 8 bytes.(one octet)
o URI: The contact URI for the captive portal that the user should
connect to. For the reasons described above, the implementer
might want to use an IP address literal instead of a DNS name.
This should be padded with NULL (0x0) to make the total option
length (including the Type and Length fields) a multiple of 8
bytes.
Thanks,
Subash
_______________________________________________
Captive-portals mailing list
Captive-portals@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
