On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 02:13, Kyle Larose wrote: > Tommy raised an objection in the issue > (https://github.com/capport-wg/architecture/issues/95) I submitted on > github for this. Initially, > I said that the API URI should be unguessable. I conflated the two > types of URI when I > wrote my initial reply. To clarify, I'm now planning only suggesting > that the user portal URI > be unguessable.
The API URI being unguessable isn't really a worthwhile goal if every device that connects to the network will be handed the same value via RA. Tommy's objection seems reasonable. _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
