Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-capport-architecture-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-capport-architecture/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing my Discuss (and comment!) points. A few new notes on the -09: Section 1.2 has a new instance of "Captive Network" that didn't get caught up in the renaming of "Captive Network" to "Captive Portal" Section 2.1 Maybe s/navigate the User Portal/navigate to the User Portal/? Dave's suggested rewording (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/nMLJv4gzGjBQZN_5-TJyrfZZbkI/) is correct but not parallel to how we discuss the DNS-ID case. I'd recommend either rewording both cases or neither, but don't have much of a stance on which is preferred. _______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
