RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> -----
> In RFC8908 the relevant Content-Type is defined as
> "application/captive+json" and not "application/capport+json".
Wow, thank god for the summary, and even with it, I had to read four times to
really see the difference!
Sounds legit, and a great way to show off the XML patcher!
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
