On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Tyrell Perera <tyr...@wso2.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanj...@wso2.com>wrote: > >> Very cool but can you please rename the feature? "wso2" is a terrible name >> for the feature! >> >> How about "makeSOAPRequest" (assuming the casing matches the normal >> convention)? >> >> > I named it wso2 assuming we might want to have more of our own API > extensions in future under that. We can rename to make-soap-request. The > convention seems to be all simple letters and hyphens for feature naming. > Ah ok so we'd only have one extension and have all our API extensions under that? If that's the model then wso2 is ok I guess. Also, gadgets.io.* makes it sound like a generic API to me. Shouldn't that >> me wso2.io.*? >> >> > Can do. > I'd be +1 for this no matter what the feature is called .. that way its clear sorta like Java package names. Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/ email: sanj...@wso2.com; phone: +1 408 754 7388 x51726; cell: +94 77 787 6880 | +1 650 265 8311 blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/ Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
