Hi,

Yeah, you will not see any performance difference between 2.2.0 and
2.5.0 versions because, the core is basically the same, only
additional features are added to 2.5.0. The major difference came with
2.2.0. So the two version you should be testing for performance should
be 2.0.0 and the 2.2.0/2.5.0 releases. And also, because of the
streaming functionality, the main advantage is memory consumption. I'm
not sure if that is possible to measure with the performance testing
framework, and to effectively test this, service calls must be made,
which returns significantly large responses.

Cheers,
Anjana.

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Eranda Sooriyabandara <era...@wso2.com> wrote:
> This test was done for the Data Services team to compare the performance of
> the Data Services servers 2.2.0 and 2.5.0 using the Performance testing
> framework.
> What I did here is add a RDBMS data source, create a data query service, and
> querying different number of  rows form the Data Service server.
> In performance test framework we can increase the number of concurrent
> requests per second(demand rate) step by step so that we can exactly get the
> point where server begin to saturate.  I tested for 100, 200, .... 1000
> query rows for 100, 120, 140, .... ,500 demand rates and get the results.
> Here I am attaching the results with this. In results.png, include a quick
> review of all results and in the zip file there are separate graphs in
> detail.
>
> thoughts:
> Data Services 2.5.0 shows slightly high performance(almost the same) than
> Data Service 2.2.0.
> We can identify the demand rate where  the server start to saturate,  which
> shows the highest response rate. When query rows increases, it saturate at
> lower demand rates.
>
> Ideally this test is to be done in separate client and server machines. But
> I ran them in same machine. Shall I  use the private cloud to do the testing
> for separate client/server?
> --
> Thanks
> Eranda
>
> _______________________________________________
> Carbon-dev mailing list
> Carbon-dev@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
>
>



-- 
Anjana Fernando
Software Engineer
WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware

_______________________________________________
Carbon-dev mailing list
Carbon-dev@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev

Reply via email to