The source & docs distribution is correctly named as wso2-carbon-studio-source-1.0.1.zip<http://dist.wso2.org/products/carbon-studio/1.0.1/wso2-carbon-studio-source-1.0.1.zip> & wso2-carbon-studio-1.0.1-docs.zip<http://wso2.org/project/carbon-studio/1.0.1/docs/wso2-carbon-studio-1.0.1-docs.zip> respectively. Why is the binary distro named inconsistently?
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote: > Why don't you simply call it wso2carbon-studio-1.0.1.zip ? > > -- > *Afkham Azeez* > Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com, > * > * > *Member; Apache Software Foundation; > **http://www.apache.org/*<http://www.apache.org/> > * > email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 77 3320919 > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> > * > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* > * > * > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* > > -- *Afkham Azeez* Senior Software Architect & Senior Manager; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com, * * *Member; Apache Software Foundation; **http://www.apache.org/*<http://www.apache.org/> * email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* * * *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org https://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
