+1. TestNG has test parameterization and multi threading test execution. these features also can be used.
Thanks NuwanW On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Afkham Azeez <az...@wso2.com> wrote: > Folks, > I was playing around a bit with TestNG ( > http://testng.org/doc/documentation-main.html#introduction) & it seems to > be the way to go for the type of integration testing we are doing. This may > involve major changes at the platform testing level but will be worth the > investment. > > Here are some articles that compare TestNG with JUnit4. We are using JUnit > 3. > > http://www.mkyong.com/unittest/junit-4-vs-testng-comparison/ > http://nelz.net/2010/10/06/testng-vs-junit4/ > > I had a chat with Krishantha & he too agrees that TestNG is more suitable > for the type of test automation we do. Does anybody have any concerns > regarding this move? > > -- > *Afkham Azeez* > Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com > Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ > * <http://www.apache.org/>** > email: **az...@wso2.com* <az...@wso2.com>* cell: +94 77 3320919 > blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* > twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> > * > linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* > * > * > *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware* > > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > architect...@wso2.org > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
