+1. System test framework will also include some integration tests because we need to do regression testing on patches, multiple platforms using that.
/Charitha On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Krishantha Samaraweera <krishan...@wso2.com > wrote: > Your are correct. We came across the same issue when designing the > framework. Since system tests runs with different configurations (e.g with > registry mounts and different DBs) we need to run all most all > product integration tests on top of product platform as well. We can not > directly have dependencies to product integration tests because of the way > we have written those tests. And, The tests architecture is also differ. We > have written the system-test-framework to address the distributed nature of > a platform deployment. Currently as what we can do is to duplicate > integration tests inside system tests. May be in future we can find a > better way to do it. > > Thanks, > Krishantha. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:57 AM, KasunG Gajasinghe <kas...@wso2.com>wrote: > >> I have a little question about System-Test-Framework. Does the >>>>> objective of it is to complement the integration tests of products, >>>>> or will it be integrated in to the product integration tests in >>>>> future? >>>>> >>>> >>>> What current integration test does is test the individual components >>>> combined and grouped into a so called product. It doesn't have platform >>>> wide tests cases. For an example, It doesn't test a scenario run on ESB, >>>> BPS and G-Reg with registry mounts and clustering. What we does in >>>> system-test-framework is test the platform as a whole. >>>> >>> >>>> Nope system-test-framework will not be integrated in to integration >>>> tests. >>>> >>> >>> Understood. But, talking from viewpoint of AS, it seems that the >>> boundary of this framework's tests and product intg tests is somewhat blur. >>> For example, AS needs to test the security scenarios of Axis2 services >>> something which also done by the system-test-framework. May be we need to >>> come to a common ground on this. >>> >> >> >> >> We are going off the topic here. Lets discuss this on carbon-dev. Please >>> ask all the question you have in there. >> >> >> +1. forwarded to carbon-dev. >> >> >>> Thanks, >>> --KasunG >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Krishantha. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm asking this because I feel like things may get duplicated between >>>>> product integration tests, and STF! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> --KasunG >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Krishantha. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Kasun Gajasinghe* >>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>> >>>>> , >>>>> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813* >>>>> *blog: **http://blog.kasunbg.org* <http://blog.kasunbg.org> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg> >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Kasun Gajasinghe* >>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> >>> , >>> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813* >>> *blog: **http://blog.kasunbg.org* <http://blog.kasunbg.org> >>> >>> * >>> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg> >>> >>> * >>> * >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Kasun Gajasinghe* >> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >> >> , >> *email: **kasung AT spamfree wso2.com** cell: **+94 (77) 678-0813* >> *blog: **http://blog.kasunbg.org* <http://blog.kasunbg.org> >> >> * >> twitter: **http://twitter.com/kasunbg* <http://twitter.com/kasunbg> >> >> * >> * >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Carbon-dev mailing list >> Carbon-dev@wso2.org >> http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Carbon-dev mailing list > Carbon-dev@wso2.org > http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
