Hi, IMHO , we should make product builds independent from each other. That is, a product should be able to build on its own, (NO pom inheritance) . We can introduce a aggregate pom, to maintain the same user experience. (you build from product level, you get all the products.)
With the above kind of structure, you can see the exact products that are failing. its the product teams responsibility to go and fix the respective product. In addition, it allow us to introduce a new product without worrying about build breaks. (for an example, the jaggery is not in the build system). we (charith, sameera and shammi) had informal discussions on the above $subject sometime back. For the time being, i'm +1 for your suggestion. In fact i have excluded GS and MS. The idea was to get a build-success mail. But product p2-profile gens failing due to registry core feature. Thanks, --Pradeep
_______________________________________________ Carbon-dev mailing list Carbon-dev@wso2.org http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/carbon-dev
