well let's give it a try then :) gj.
Mark Alan wrote: > Gjergj Sheldija wrote: > >> don't you think it'll be too much of an overload for the main db to handle >> even the access logs ? >> every time you click in a module on c2x it generates a log entry.. >> that's why i preferred the sqlite way..quick inserts with practically >> filesystem access times... >> > > From the moment you put that info on disc it will always steal some > time and hardware resources from your server. > > If you put that info in a table you will always have the overhead of > opening a table. > > If you put that info in a table in a different database, you will have > the additional overhead of opening yet another database or, worse, > another database in another DBMS. > > In general if you work with tables in the same database and inside the > same DBMS, that DBMS will do a much better work at optimizing the > machine's resources (OS, memory and disk access) usage. > > > M. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Care2002-developers mailing list > Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
