Y Ip n On Nov 9, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Scott Battaglia <scott.battag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We typically follow the uPortal one which I believe was based off of > Apache (which we follow for everything else :-)). > > When we set "4.0" as our SAML goal and decided to release the > required changes earlier rather than later, that's how we came up > with the current numbering versions. > > If we're going to call it 4.0, then I'd prefer that we scope the > Service Management changes in and get all of our major API changes > in at once. > > Most of the API changes that were going to be in 3.5 were API > changes that we as developers write against (even if others were > also able to write against then. I.e. SessionStorage) > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Marvin Addison <marvin.addi...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > At 4.0 seems to be consistent with the uP Release Strategy: > > https://wiki.jasig.org/display/UPC/Release+Strategy assuming we are > > still follow it. > > Thanks for pointing that out, Bill. I know different projects have > different standards for version number changes, but all the ones I've > seen agree that major API changes are major number increases. If we > don't already have a document that describes our criteria for version > changes, we should either draft one or follow guidelines from another > project (uPortal seems fine). > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: dadil...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
