Isn't that what this thread is supposed to be discussing?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Dmitriy Kopylenko < dmitriy.kopyle...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Wiki is updated stating that minimum JDK for CAS 4.x will be 1.6: > https://wiki.jasig.org/display/CASUM/Java+Versions > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Scott Battaglia <scott.battag...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> If it doesn't say 1.5 or higher, than it should be corrected. Its >> intended to say 1.5 or higher. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>wrote: >> >>> Not aware of any specific language features devs might need, but given >>> the major coming release I think it’s a good time to up the version >>> requirement and anticipate the need, so to speak. Perhaps the word >>> “requirement” is not the best phrasing. What I have in mind mostly falls >>> down to the level of “Does CAS run or support JDK6 and above?” The official >>> wording that CAS requires 1.5 sort of gives the impression that if folks >>> proceed with a later java version, the upgrade will break something in CAS. >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *-*Misagh* >>> >>> * >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* Scott Battaglia >>> [mailto:scott.battag...@gmail.com<scott.battag...@gmail.com>] >>> >>> *Sent:* Monday, July 30, 2012 2:39 PM >>> *To:* cas-dev@lists.jasig.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [cas-dev] Next CAS release + JDK 6**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Is there a compelling feature that would make us want to require 1.6?*** >>> * >>> >>> On Jul 30, 2012 5:09 PM, "Misagh Moayyed" <mmoay...@unicon.net> wrote:** >>> ** >>> >>> Team, **** >>> >>> Given the next major CAS release in planning, I wanted to propose that >>> we up the JDK requirement for CAS from the 5 to 6. As far as I know, there >>> aren’t any particular changes in the codebase that depend on JDK5 >>> specifically and we at Unicon have been doing CAS deployments based on the >>> JDK6 platform with much success. (I could possibly safely assume that most >>> other adopters are already on JDK6, if not later). **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I think switching the platform requirement to 6 at the time of a major >>> release would be a reasonable. Feedback is welcome :)**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Regards,**** >>> >>> *-*Misagh**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> -- >>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: >>> scott.battag...@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev**** >>> >>> -- >>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: >>> mmoay...@unicon.net >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev**** >>> >>> -- >>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: >>> scott.battag...@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >>> >>> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: >> dmitriy.kopyle...@gmail.com >> >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
