We have compared the error handling behavior of ldaptive versus Spring LDAP in CAS and the results are very interesting:
https://github.com/serac/cas-server-integration-ldaptive/wiki/Error-Handling-and-Recovery-Comparison Executive summary: ldaptive provides for graceful recovery on directory failover for common failure modes. Beyond the favorable results for ldaptive, the results highlight that connection pooling with the existing components does not necessarily buy improved resiliency. If you want a HA CAS deployment with an LDAP backend for authentication, you must give careful consideration to the configuration of connection pools. Hopefully this comparison provides some important background and points of consideration for HA deployments in addition to making the case that ldaptive wins over Spring LDAP in resiliency. M -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
