On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:22 AM, jleleu <lel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > @Bill : you're right, it may be confusing, I rewrote the introduction of the > documentation. For Google SAML2 support, you don't need steps 2 and 3.
Thanks, Jérôme. CAS SAML1.1 Attribute response (steps 2 and 3) and Google SAML2 (step 4) are completely orthogonal from a configuration and feature point of view, correct? If so, I be happy to take a crack at editing this for clarity. Best, Bill > > @Misagh : you're also right, there is still a "SAML component" (a small one > hard to extract) to send SLO requests. Some weeks ago, we agreed on that a > second stage would be necessary for that and I proposed to refactor more > globally SLO. I will come back to you soon with a proposal. > > Best regards, > Jérôme > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: wgt...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
