On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Scott Battaglia <[email protected]> wrote: > The point of overriding the file explicitly was so that you had a point of > reference to diff against when a new version came out. > > Rather than providing additional (confusing) ways to override more behavior > (I've used a similar system in the past where XML files were loaded > alphabetically and its not too pleasant to work with either), I'd rather we > continue to improve upon existing methods to keep eliminating the need to > even adjust those files.
+1 > > > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:01 AM, jleleu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I think it's a very good idea because when you have some overrides in >> copied complete files, it's pretty hard to find them back and report them >> back on a new CAS server version. >> >> +1 >> >> Best regards, >> Jérôme >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >> [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
