On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:59 AM, jleleu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > -1 to move the issue trackers to github. I find JIRA to be a very good tool > for that. > > Regarding documentation, I'm not so enthousiastic to move everything to > github. It would be easier to handle pull requests for documentation's > improvments though, but I'm not sure that it's such an important feature to > have. > > We already have a lot of documentation on the wiki and Confluence is a good > tool. Maybe we can just reorganize the whole documentation and add the > appropiate links on github pointing to the Confluence's wiki pages. > > +1 to create a migration guide from 3.x to 4.0. > > More globally, I'm wondering : what will happen when we will move (in a > couple of years) to nextbigscmtool.com ?
I hear what you are saying about churn, and certainly we don't want to make these kinds of decisions lightly or too frequently. However, tools change...if there is better option that will benefit the us...we should move to it. Best, Bill > > Best regards, > Jérôme > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
