+1, just wait for my fix...
2013/12/18 Robert Oschwald <[email protected]> > +1 > > > Am 18.12.2013 um 10:17 schrieb Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]>: > > Great. I am happy to volunteer and give RC3 a shot once more. > > So lets sort of put this out to the team: The proposal is to proceed with > an RC3 first, preferably by the upcoming weekend and then a GA in the later > part of January. (I am assuming that RC3 would also include a fix for the > latest kyro serilization issue that Jérôme reported on another thread.) > > Does this sound reasonable to everyone? > > Misagh > > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Jérôme LELEU" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:11:06 AM > *Subject: *Re: [cas-dev] CAS Protocol v3 Status > > I have nothing against an earlier schedule if we can make it... > > > 2013/12/17 Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]> > >> RC3 sounds good, though I think we can cut it earlier. Practically we are >> ready to put together RC3 as early as this weekend perhaps, allow a couple >> of weeks and then a GA by say January 21st? >> >> >> >> Misagh >> >> >> >> *From:* Jérôme LELEU [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:39 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [cas-dev] CAS Protocol v3 Status >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Using the same date makes sense. Though, the protocol spec won't change >> from now. So I wouldn't be annoyed to have a prior date for the spec >> release. >> >> >> >> Regarding the CAS 4.0 release, the main question we need to address is : >> do we need one more RC before the final release ? I tend to say yes. >> >> So, in that case, I would plan a RC3 at the beginning of Juanary and the >> final release at the beginning of February, let's say monday, the 3th >> February. >> >> >> >> What do you think ? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jérôme >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/12/12 Robert Oschwald <[email protected]> >> >> in my opinion we do need a release date for the new specification. >> >> I recommend we use the same date as for 4.0, as we tag the release in >> git, right? >> >> >> >> Otherwise, it might be worth thinking of moving the protocol dir out into >> the gh-pages branch as Marvin proposed. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 12.12.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Jérôme LELEU <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> >> >> I'm not sure to understand why we need the release date of the 4.0 in the >> protocol spec. >> >> Would you mind enlightening me on this ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jérôme >> >> >> >> >> >> 2013/12/12 Robert Oschwald <[email protected]> >> >> Please note that I will add a new pull request after 355 is merged >> >> and right before release including: >> >> - update the document version to 3.0 (release) >> >> - set the Release Date >> >> >> >> For this, I need a concrete release date from you all. >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 12.12.2013 um 12:47 schrieb Misagh Moayyed <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> Update: There are two pending JIRAs that should be the last what's left >> on the list before the next release: >> >> >> >> CAS-1284: (protocol doc updates) https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/355 >> >> CAS-1283: (new p3 endpoints) https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/375 >> >> Misagh >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >> [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: >> [email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> -- >> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see >> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev >> >> > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
