Hi, I tend to think that Lombok is a fairly stable project over time as I've heard about it for years now.
I already had many debattes about Lombok with my colleagues. The idea to spare getters/setters is appealing, though we need to jump into "more magic". What happens if you debug a "Lomboked" class at runtime? What source code do you have? Are the line numbers relevant if the source has been transformed? Best regards, Jérôme LELEU Founder of CAS in the cloud: www.casinthecloud.com | Twitter: @leleuj Chairman of CAS: www.jasig.org/cas | Creator of pac4j: www.pac4j.org 2014-07-14 22:34 GMT+02:00 Marvin Addison <[email protected]>: > > How do we feel about taking advantage of Project Lombok? > > > > http://projectlombok.org/index.html > > Wow, that looks pretty amazing. Thanks for sharing. > > > Seems to help with a ton of boilerplate code (setter/getter/equals, > etc). It > > would be a pretty sizeable task to convert all but I think in the long > run, > > it will help make things simpler to understand and code. > > I like the idea, but agree that it would be a fairly large change. I > would be interested to know more about the history of lombok and what > projects are using it. A technology like this has a lot of promise, > but it's a substantial investment since it goes to the root of > everything. We would need some assurance it's a stable project with a > sound future. > > M > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: > [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
