> So, would if be fair to state something like this: > > "When you configure Attribute Release as documented in the Services > Management section of the CAS User Manual you will not see these attributes > in the default CAS 1.0 or 2.0 response, only in the SAML validation > response."
That is a correct statement, with emphasis on "default" CAS response. This is actually a point of some confusion in the userbase; many folks have come here trying to hack the 2.0 protocol jsps to put attributes in there not knowing SAML provides attributes out of the box. I think anything we can do to make it clear that SAML is the easiest way to get attribute release to work would be worthwhile. While not all clients support SAML, a growing number do support it. M -- You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
