We're currently running the shib idp 2 and CAS 3, with plans to upgrade to idp 3 by the end of the year and to CAS 4 once 4.1 comes out. Evidentally idp 3 has CAS protocol support and I was wondering how that compares to CAS itself. They say the idp CAS support is intended to supplant a separate CAS server, but didn't really know what features/functionality might be lost if migrating to the idp CAS implementation.
I was just wondering if anybody here is familiar with both and might be able to provide some pros/cons of consolidating CAS into the idp vs continuing to maintain a separate CAS deployment? Thanks... -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.cpp.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | hen...@cpp.edu California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 -- You are currently subscribed to cas-user@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
