My loadtested CAS (only CAS Server over LDAP) is able to do over 100
logins per second. (90% login success - 10% wrong username&password).

Next month i'll do an heavy stress test.
I'll post result (must wait)

Bye

On 14/11/06, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you look at top during your load testing what processes are using the 
> most resources?
>
> We've loadtested CAS and been able to do over 60 logins per second (I'm not 
> sure of the exact number)
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
> On 11/14/06, Giesin, Peter (NBC Universal) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I am using 3.0.5.  Yes, that looks true. I just can't seem to get any 
> > performance out of this  thing. Have you done any type of load testing? 
> > What type of performance have you  seen? If I can't get this this work any 
> > better I an going to have to pull it and  replace it with something else. I 
> > just can't seem to get more than 20-30 login  requests per second.
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott    
> > Battaglia
> > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:08 PM
> > To:    Yale CAS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: CAS    Performance
> >
> > Which version of CAS are you using?     Later versions synchronize on the 
> > specific ticket and not on any    registries.
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> >
> > On 11/13/06, Pete    Giesin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    wrote:
> > > After      looking at it some more I think the log entries are not 
> > > related.
> > > One is      the login and the other is the logout that is being processed.
> > >
> > > The      concern that I have is the large number of synchronized blocks
> > > that are      being used. This seems like it will cause many bottlenecks. 
> > > I
> > > updated the      DefaultTicketCache to use JCS and removed the 
> > > synchronized
> > > methods. This      seemed to help out some, but not entirely.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Pete
> > >
> > > On      11/13/06, Scott Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      wrote:
> > > > Pete,
> > > >
> > > > Does that happen all the      time?  (and is this only with one user?). 
> > > >  The
> > > >      result of an "authenticatedButNoService" call is a request to 
> > > > render      the
> > > > viewGenericLoginSuccess page. Rendering a      genericLoginSuccessView 
> > > > should not
> > > > result in a ticket being      removed.  Tickets are only removed if you 
> > > > do a
> > > > renew=true      with different credentials or if logout is called 
> > > > (unless I am
> > > >      remembering wrong).
> > > >
> > > > Also, CAS itself is not very memory      intensive so 4 GB of memory 
> > > > should be
> > > > more than      sufficient.  We did find in our testing (which we did on 
> > > > a
> > > > single-CPU machine) that the majority of the CPU time was being      
> > > > taken up by
> > > > Apache processes (but then we had an underpowered      machine).
> > > >
> > > > -Scott
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/13/06, Pete      Giesin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>      wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > More specs: dual AMD dual core cpu's with      4GB of memory.
> > > > >
> > > > > One interesting thing is the 2      second delay between these  
> > > > > actions:
> > > > >
> > > > >      2006-11-13 17:02:27,856 DEBUG
> > > > >      [org.jasig.cas.web.flow.HasServiceCheckAction] - <Action
> > > > >      'HasServiceCheckAction' completed execution; result is
> > > > >      'authenticatedButNoService'>
> > > > > 2006-11-13 17:02:29,792      DEBUG
> > > > > [org.jasig.cas.CentralAuthenticationServiceImpl]      -
> > > > <Removing ticket
> > > > >      [TGT-369-p62ifeG755sWev2LdE1Cl9pjPmUFJKeZMzk-50] from
> > > > registry.>
> > > > >
> > > > > Pete
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/13/06, Scott      Battaglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      wrote:
> > > > > > Do you hav any more information on the specs?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/13/06, Pete      Giesin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>      wrote:
> > > > > > > HP blade running Redhat Linux for 64-bit.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 11/13/06, Scott Battaglia      < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>      wrote:
> > > > > > > > What type of server is it?
> > > > >      > > >
> > > > > > > > -Scott
> > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/13/06,      Pete Giesin < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >      wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I      am performing some load testing against CAS and am 
> > > > > > > > > getting
> > > >      terrible
> > > > > > > > > results. Something like 30      requests per second. I have 
> > > > > > > > > CAS running
> > > > on
> > > > > > >      > > a single server using Apache + Tomcat. I have a JDBC     
> > > > > > >  datasource
> > > > > > > > > defined for the user lookups. I      also have an ehcache 
> > > > > > > > > defined to
> > > > cache
> > > > > > > >      > the users. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions 
> > > > > > > > on how      to
> > > > > > > > > tweak the configuration in order to      increase the 
> > > > > > > > > performance. My
> > > > > > > > > objective is      100 requests per second.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >      > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Pete
> > > > >      > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > >      > > > > > Yale CAS mailing list
> > > > > > > >      > [email protected]
> > > >      > > > > > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > >      > > > >
> > > > > > > >      _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > >      Yale CAS mailing list
> > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >      > > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > >      > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >      >
> > > > > > >      _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Yale      CAS mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >      > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > >      > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >      _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Yale CAS      mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >      http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >      _______________________________________________
> > > > > Yale CAS      mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >  http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > >      >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >      _______________________________________________
> > > > Yale CAS mailing      list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >  http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Yale CAS mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >  http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Yale CAS mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >  http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Yale CAS mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Yale CAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas

Reply via email to