I don't have the code in front of me but from a cursory read of what you've written, that sounds correct. It seems like you are using the code in HEAD. That code is currently in flux as we add new features (i.e. HEAD now defines an additional method for Single Log Out that was not there in M2). So you will be trying to hit a moving target and the code has not been thoroughly tested yet.
-Scott On 5/11/07, Peter Kharchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott, everyone, I am working on CASifying a closed-source app that takes username/password on the frontend, and allows to provide a pluggable module on the back end to validate the credentials. The backend can only answer "valid/invalid", so I have to provide the real username together with the ticket (and the ticket has to be passed under a different param name as well). I am sure this has been encountered numerous times, but I couldn't find an answer searching the archives, so figured I'd ask. As far as I can tell, I would need to provide an alternative to SimpleWebApplicationServiceImpl that would append both the ticket and username (under some configurable params). I would use a different keyword instead of "service" or "TARGET" to distinguish it from standard and SAML service implementations. And then I would simply add the new ServiceImpl to "argumentExtractors" list in cas-servlet.xml. The validation config can stay the same. Does this sound right? thanks in advance, -peter. _______________________________________________ Yale CAS mailing list [email protected] http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
-- -Scott Battaglia LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
_______________________________________________ Yale CAS mailing list [email protected] http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
