Hi, I was compiling the wideband spectrometer from the 2009 tutorials. http://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/Tutorials
It was compilted well with ROACH:sx95t. but when I chose ROACH:lx110t, I got the following error message and suggestion - xilperl D:/Xilinx/EDK/data/fpga_impl/observe_par.pl -error yes implementation/system.par Analyzing implementation/system.par ***************************************************************************** *** ERROR: 1 constraint not met. PAR could not meet all timing constraints. A bitstream will not be generated. To disable the PAR timing check: 1> Disable the "Treat timing closure failure as error" option from the Project Options dialog in XPS. OR 2> Type following at the XPS prompt: XPS% xset enable_par_timing_error 0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- How do I do to bring up the XPS or its prompt? Thanks. -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) ---------- Original Message ----------- From: casper-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu To: casper@lists.berkeley.edu Sent: Sat, 01 May 2010 12:55:16 -0700 Subject: casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > Send casper mailing list submissions to > casper@lists.berkeley.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://calmail.berkeley.edu/manage/list/listinfo/cas...@lists.berkel ey.edu > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > casper-requ...@lists.berkeley.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > casper-ow...@lists.berkeley.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of casper digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: 'The Great Debate: Are We Alone?' (Tonight) (dana whitlow) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:15:22 -0400 > From: dana whitlow <dwhit...@naic.edu> > Subject: Re: [casper] 'The Great Debate: Are We Alone?' (Tonight) > To: melvyn wright <melvyn.wri...@gmail.com> > Cc: casper@lists.berkeley.edu > Message-ID: <4bdb486a.2040...@naic.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Good idea- we'll just hook that right up. Let's see now- should it > be 430 MHz or 2380 MHz? > > Dana > > melvyn wright wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:13 PM, David Hawkins <d...@ovro.caltech.edu> wrote: > > > >>> will the debate be recorded, and available later for humans or for LGMs ? > >>> > >> Shouldn't we be blasting it out into space for the LGMs > >> to listen to live? > >> > >> :) > >> > > > > not according to > > http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2010/0430/Stephen- Hawking-alien-warning-Could-we-talk-to-them > > > > :-( > > > > M. > > > > > > > > > > End of casper Digest, Vol 30, Issue 1 > ************************************* ------- End of Original Message -------
