Ok! Thanks! Nimish
On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:10 PM, David MacMahon <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu> wrote: > Hi, Nimish, > > Sorry for my "10_Gbe_v2" typo. I meant "ten_Gbe_v2". There is no > "10_Gbe_v2" block. I am using the "ten_Gbe_v2" block for ROACH2. > > Dave > > On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Nimish Sane wrote: > >> Hi Dave and others, >> >> I was under the impression that "ten_Gbe_v2" was suppose to support ROACH2 >> as well. At least, its mask supports parameters specific to ROACH2 (such as >> choice between CX4, SFP+ and ports etc.). Rather, these options are >> available in the mask only for ROACH2. >> >> Is "10_Gbe_v2" part of SKA-SA github repository now and is that supposed to >> be used instead of "ten_Gbe_v2"? I have not updated the repository of late >> and have been using ten_Gbe_v2 for my ROACH2 design. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nimish >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:07 PM, David MacMahon <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu> >> wrote: >> Hi, John, >> >> My current work is on ROACH2 and the "10_Gbe_v2" block is the only 10 GbE >> block supported on ROACH2 so that's the one I'm currently designing with >> (but not yet using myself). I'm not sure which block Christopher used in >> the packet generator. His design ran on a ROACH so it could have been using >> the "ten_GbE" or "ten_Gbe_v2" block. >> >> Dave >> >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 2:01 PM, John Ford wrote: >> >>>> Hi, John, >>>> >>>> The benchmarking tests were done here by Christopher Schollar who was >>>> visiting from the University of Cape Town. I'm not sure which library >>>> version he used, but I can find out. >>> >>> It was mostly just curiosity on my part, but are you using the same blocks >>> for your work? >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:30 PM, John Ford wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Hi, Rich, >>>>>> >>>>>> We've sustained 9.9 Gpbs simultaneously from two 10 GbE ports (19.8 >>>>>> Gbps >>>>>> aggregate) on a ROACH into a PC with two 10 GbE NICs without dropping >>>>>> any >>>>>> packets. This was direct connect (i.e. no switch) and "transmit only" >>>>>> (i.e. no packets were sent back to the ROACH). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rich, Dave, can you tell us the versions of the libraries you have? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>>> Hope this helps, >>>>>> Dave >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Rich Lacasse wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using the latest 10 GbE yellow block, has anyone achieved a sustained >>>>>>> data rate of greater than 8 Gb/s? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Rich >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
