Thanks Glenn.

I'll check the output of RS232 port ...


2014-07-10 8:42 GMT-06:00 G Jones <glenn.calt...@gmail.com>:

> I mean wherever you have defined the startudp function. I notice there's
> already this line in there:
> xil_printf("UDP pcb instantiated\n\r");
>
> If I recall, this message will go to the RS-232 serial port. I suggest
> watching the output from that port when you try to send the startudp
> command and see if you see any of the expected messages.
> You can then add other xil_printf statements to see what part the program
> is getting stuck on.
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Rolando Paz <flx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do I must do this in main.c file?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-07-10 8:30 GMT-06:00 G Jones <glenn.calt...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Try adding some debug printf type statements to the startudp function to
>>> see where it might be getting hung up.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Rolando Paz <flx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> With Aaron's bitfile the transmission of bram is initialized, I can see
>>>> this from wireshark, but with my bitfile nothing happens ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-07-10 8:21 GMT-06:00 G Jones <glenn.calt...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> What happens when you try to startupddump?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Rolando Paz <flx...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Glenn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Griffin helped me understand that the file that I should use is
>>>>>> called "download.bit" and not the original file that was compiled :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, now I login via telnet again and I can not start udp dump.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> version
>>>>>> clkmeasure
>>>>>> clkreset
>>>>>> clkphase
>>>>>> listdev
>>>>>> read
>>>>>> write
>>>>>> readbase
>>>>>> writebase
>>>>>> setbase
>>>>>> regwrite
>>>>>> regread
>>>>>> bramwrite
>>>>>> bramread
>>>>>> bramdump
>>>>>> ifconfig
>>>>>> startudpdump
>>>>>> endudpdump
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I think now I am using the correct bitfile, but still missing
>>>>>> something ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rolando Paz
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to