2009/12/22 Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com>: > But would you (as Gary IIRC mentioned > earlier) prefer the old constructors back instead to minimize changes to > Cassandra?
In a perfect world, Thrift wouldn't go breaking stuff that wasn't causing problems, or if they did they would admit it and roll things back. It's already too late for the first, and I don't give the second good odds either. But this is not something to burn a lot of cycles on. If your heart is set on using thrift 0.2, then patch Cassandra so it works. Otherwise just build the new structures with the old thrift compiler, just use the version in the libthrift filename. -Jonathan
