~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{ Ballot }~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  [ 4 ] 2    http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/002
  [ 3 ] 30   http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/030
  [ 11 ] 32   http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/032
  [ 10 ] 33   http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/033
  [ 5 ] 90   http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/090
  [ 1 ] 173  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/173
  [ 7 ] 175  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/175
  [ 8 ] 291  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/291
  [ 6 ] 369  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/369
  [ 9 ] 478  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/478
  [ 12 ] 576  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/576
  [ 2 ] 598  http://99designs.com/contests/28940/entries/598
  [ 13 ] NOTA
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{ Ballot }~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


On 10/5/09 11:12 AM, "Eric Evans" <eev...@rackspace.com> wrote:

> 
> Alrighty then. Time to vote on a project logo.
> 
> The ballot is made up of all the finalist logos with a rating of either
> 4 or 5 stars[0], and "None of the Above" (just in case you want to
> express your disgust with one or more of the choices).
> 
> To vote, reply to the list and fill in the boxes of the ballot below.
> Rank each choice with a number between 1 and 13 (where 1 is your most
> favorite, and 13 is your least). It is not strictly necessary to rank
> every choice (though it is recommended). Skipping numbers is also OK,
> but it has no bearing on the weight of your rankings, (i.e. 2,5,10 is
> the equivalent of 1,2,3).
>
> 

Reply via email to