2009/10/5 Michael Greene <michael.gre...@gmail.com>: > Briefly > * Coherence is in-memory, Cassandra is persisted
Coherence can be persistent. > * Coherence has a transactional model, Cassandra is eventually consistent > * Coherence has specially written adapters for different > environments/languages, Cassandra supports most languages through > Thrift > * They both are distributed repositories of data written in Java > > Coherence seems to be in the same write-through cache / in-memory DB > space as Terracotta or Gigaspaces, and not the distributed database > space like Cassandra. It might be interesting to evaluate Coherence's > clustering mechanisms, but I couldn't easily find documentation. > > Michael > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Evren Guden <evrengu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> What are the differences and similarities between Cassandra and oracle >> coherence? >> Thanks in advance. >> Sincerely, >> Evren >> >> > -- Jonas Bonér twitter: @jboner blog: http://jonasboner.com work: http://crisp.se work: http://scalablesolutions.se code: http://github.com/jboner code: http://akkasource.org
