Hi Jonathan, That's me. I understand that it can be painful to update.
However I would say that a project of the size and popularity of Cassandra deserves a dedicated configuration documentation. Also the Wiki format allows you to make links to other pages which obviously becomes non-clickable when translated to XML. It allows you to add pictures too which I plan to do to link the config parameters to an architecture documentation (wiki).
As per porting the wiki to 0.5, I volunteer to update the page (or create a 0.5 version of that page);
what do you think? Alex Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Hi, Someone has been industriously improving the documentation of the config file settings on the wiki. I'd rather move that into the config file itself though rather than have it get out of date when we update things. (E.g. moving from 0.4 to 0.5 RSN.) I'd appreciate it if you could submit a patch for the xml instead. -Jonathan
