On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Erik Holstad <erikhols...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Haha! > > Thanks. Well I'm z little bit worried about this but since the indexes > are > > pretty > > small I don't think it is going to be too bad. But was mostly thinking > about > > performance and and having the index row as a bottleneck for writing, > since > > the > > partition is per row. > > Writing N columns to 1 row is faster than writing 1 column to N rows, > even when all N are coming from different clients. Our concurrency > story there is excellent. > That sounds good, and the same thing goes for reading, cause that is basically what I'm looking for, faster reads, not too worried about the writes. Thanks a lot!