So, do you think it will be problematic on a large scale? If yes is it configurable in 0.6?
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Avinash Lakshman <avinash.laksh...@gmail.com> wrote: > We have observed this. But in practice it doesn't cause any deleterious > effects. IMHO detecting false failures of nodes is the most dangerous thing > that could result from this kind of behavior. But that is why we have an > Accrual FD which reacts and adjusts to these conditions. But having said > that moving TCP is not a bad option at all at relatively small scale. > > Cheers > Avinash > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash > <ashwin.jayaprak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey guys! I have a simple question. I'm a casual observer, not a real >> Cassandra user yet. So, excuse my ignorance. >> >> I see that the Gossip feature uses UDP. I was curious to know if you guys >> faced issues with unreliable transports in your production clusters? Like >> faulty switches, dropped packets etc during heavy network loads? >> >> If I'm not mistaken are all client reads/writes doing point-to-point over >> TCP? >> >> Thanks, >> Ashwin. >> >> > >
