I believe the WCF facility does this already? Are you seeing that it is not?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:30 PM, josh robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > this looks reasonable to me... create a patch and add it @ > support.castleproject.org. > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:30 AM, fintz69 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been running into some problems while using the container to > > create singleton WCF proxies due to wcf faulted proxies behavior. > > I've created a simple implementation of the ILifeStyleManager that > > gets around that situation. > > > > http://javicrespotech.blogspot.com/2008/09/singleton-wcf-proxy.html > > > > I was wondering if this little piece of work would be suitable to be > > added into the WCF facility... > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
