Hi Castle users! On December 31, 2008, my company finally released the application framework I've been working on for the last one and a half years; it's called re-motion: <http://re-motion.org/blogs/team/archive/2008/12/31/ re-lease-or-is-re-motion-really-open-source.aspx>.
The component I'm working on, re-motion mixins, is using Castle DynamicProxy's code generation facilities to generate its plumbing code. I've started blogging about it at <http://www.re-motion.org/ blogs/mix/Default.aspx>, and I'd value your opinions on whether you think that what we've released could be valuable to other people or not. I know that Hammett (http://hammett.castleproject.org/?p=323) has already shown some interest, and I'd like a broader view. Do you think you could make use of an "extended" mixin mechanism (more powerful than what DynamicProxy provides out of the box, and of course for other scenarios)? Or rather not? Would an integration with IoC containers make sense, or wouldn't you use it anyway? (More blog posts will follow, of course.) Best regards, and thanks in advance, Fabian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
