OK, so I quickly wrote a little Resolver (hey - I'm impressed, this
was actually much easier than I first thought! Thanx to Tuna and
http://tunatoksoz.com/post/Castle-ServiceIdResolver.aspx).

So my current setup is, that I have a singleton instance of the
container globally available in my app. In the ctor of the singleton I
do all the configuration, like registering components. I already
figured, that I have to first register the Resolver before registering
any components. But at this point in time I don't know the actual
values I want to supply via the resolver.

So I need to access the resolver a little bit later in my app and set
some properties - obviously before resolving any components via
castle. But how do I get a handle of the resolver-instance?

On 4 Mrz., 23:39, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yep, you need a resolver for this.check ISubDependencyResolver for the
> details.
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Henning <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > hmm OK - and how ould I do something like that?
>
> > I assume I have to write my own resolver, which can inject this
> > parameter to my component? If I'm adding such a resolver to my
> > container, I still will have to tell the resolve the actual value to
> > inject.
>
> > I didn't mention it, because I don't know if it does matter - this is
> > a web-based app, and the "itemId" depends on the request being served
> > - so the container is most likely only once initialized and then never
> > again :)
>
> > On 4 Mrz., 23:28, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > if you have just global stuff, you can use a sub resolver to handle that
>
> > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Henning <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I have an interesting problem. I have a whole bunch of components,
> > > > which are registered in my castle container. I mass-registered them
> > > > either based on a certain naming convention or on a common base-
> > > > interface they implement. This allows me to register all my components
> > > > with just two lines of code (kinda) using the fluent API.
>
> > > > So next I build my app using all those nice available components. So
> > > > each components specifies their needs as constructor-parameters. So
> > > > now I'm accessing only a handful of components directly in my app,
> > > > everything else is magically handled by castle.
>
> > > > OK, so now comes the catch. I have a component ConfigurationContext,
> > > > which needs an itemId parameter. This needs to be supplied by the app,
> > > > but the component is not resolved by the app, but by the dependencies
> > > > of other components.
>
> > > > So I would like to go ahead an tell castle "hey, is anyone needs the
> > > > itemId; it's 42!".
>
> > > > I though this must be achievable by using properties. I remembered
> > > > back when working with windsor.config.xml I could pass parameters to a
> > > > component while referencing a property. This was also specified in the
> > > > config-file, but hey, couldn't that be done via code as well? So this
> > > > is the real question: how would I do something like that? So how could
> > > > I tell the castle container that the value of a property called
> > > > "itemId" is 42?
>
> > > > And by the way: since I mass-registered all my components I would need
> > > > to adjust the ConfigurationContext component, so that castle know to
> > > > pull the "itemId" property as a paramter for this component. If I
> > > > would register this component individually I would do something like:
>
> > > > Container.Register(Component.For<IConfigurationContext>
> > > > ().ImplementedBy<ConfigurationContext>().Parameters(Parameter.ForKey
> > > > ("ItemId").Eq("{itemId}")));
>
> > > > So is there any way to "modify" an existing component-registration?-
> > Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to