yes! Tuna Toksöz Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz http://tunatoksoz.com http://twitter.com/tehlike On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Uri Goldstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > OK, > > Looks like I should've spent a couple more minutes digging around. :) > > I now figure that the "conventional" usage for WindosrContainer would > be: > > WindsorContainer windsorContainer = new WindsorContainer(new > XmlInterpreter()); > > And that this will fetch the DI configuration from app.config / > web.config. > > Am I correct? > > Tx, > urig > > > On Aug 26, 8:50 pm, Uri Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Aiming for "convention over configuration" for the location of my > > windsor configuration xml, I was thinking the most conventional way to > > use the WindsorContainer might be to use the empty constructor, > > assuming it looks for the xml from some predetermined location. > > > > Am I correct in this assumption and where might this predetermined > > location be? > > > > BTW as far as I could find on the castle website, the WindsorContainer > > class itself is poorly documented in comparison to its > > interface:http://www.castleproject.org/container/documentation/trunk/ > > manual/windsortypedocs/Generated_IWindsorContainer.html > > > > Thanks, > > urig > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
