regardless of the discussion in the other thread, I'm still interested in your feedback here, so do speak up.
On Sep 22, 2:48 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > I want to do some rework for Windsor 3, and slim it down a little, and > as part of it, I'm considering moving the following facilities out of > Windsor.dll to their own assemblies (similar to Synchronize Facility) > > * Event Wiring facility (because it's not that useful/used) > * Remoting Facility (because remoting is de-facto obsolete) > * Factory Support (because with UsingFactoryMethod in the fluent API > not depending on it, there's no really good reason to use it > unless you register stuff via XML) > > That would mean that only Startable and TypedFactory facilities would > still live in Windsor.dll > > Objections? Thoughts? > > Krzysztof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
