Yeap, the goal is to keep it a standalone facility, much like Synchronize Facility is now in v2.5

On 24/09/2010 11:04 PM, Jason Meckley wrote:
If one is not using the ATM facility can Windsor be deployed without
Castle.Services.Transaction? If so merge them.

On Sep 23, 6:58 pm, Jonathan Vukovich<[email protected]>  wrote:
+1!

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Tyler Burd<[email protected]>  wrote:
  I’d say merge ‘em.  I don’t know of anyone who uses Services.Transaction
without ATM.  I could be in an isolated world, though…
Having everything transaction related in one assembly also helps simplify
things;  I know when I introduced the ATM to certain developers they would
add a reference to one assembly and forget about the other, then get
confused when things weren’t compiling or working properly.
*From:* [email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Henrik Feldt
*Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:52 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Cc:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Castle.Services.Transaction + Castle.Windsor?
Hello everyone,
I’m considering merging the code of Castle.Services.Transaction with
Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement/AutoTX. This would
introduce a dependency on Castle.Windsor for Castle.Services.Transaction.
(Another way of saying it is that the IoC-container would be required for
using the transactions project, which it is not now. However, it could
simplify versioning/dll-management slightly).
As of now it is merely a thought: please tell me what your opinions are on
whether to merge them or not!
Kind regards,
Henrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle 
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to